On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:08 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 08:16:09AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote: >> In preparation for unconditionally passing the struct timer_list pointer to >> all timer callbacks, switch to using the new timer_setup() and from_timer() >> to pass the timer pointer explicitly. >> >> Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx> >> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Do you expect drm folks to apply this, or is this part of a larger refactoring? If the drm tree includes -rc3, you can carry these. If you don't want to carry these and want the timer tree to carry them, we can do that too. > A notch more context in the commit message would help ... Sorry about that, my added context for this go lost in later conversion patches. -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
