On Wed, 11 Oct 2017, Alex Ivanov <gnidorah@xxxxx> wrote: > On 11.10.2017 12:04, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >> Why exactly is the existing dpms ioctl not good enough? it's implemented >> as the "DPMS" property attached to connectors, but that's the only >> difference compared to your code here. >> >> Also, that one doesn't have any XXX about atomic like yours. >> >> I also have no idea how this fixes any of your above problems. >> -Daniel > It's not good enough because it will only succeed if caller is current > DRM master. Which means it will work only in console, since X.Org > and Wayland hold DRM_MASTER. As said elsewhere in the thread, this is a feature, not a bug. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
