On 11.10.2017 12:04, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Why exactly is the existing dpms ioctl not good enough? it's implemented as the "DPMS" property attached to connectors, but that's the only difference compared to your code here. Also, that one doesn't have any XXX about atomic like yours. I also have no idea how this fixes any of your above problems. -Daniel
It's not good enough because it will only succeed if caller is current DRM master. Which means it will work only in console, since X.Org and Wayland hold DRM_MASTER. But as a security measure this new separate ioctl requires calling process to be root one. I will fix XXX atomic in second version of this patch, it's pretty mechanical change. Current stage is to get acceptance by public. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
