>
> We would look forward to your comments. thank you.
I think the only thing I can see wanting changing at this point is to
add padding to the
offset ioctl.
struct drm_samsung_gem_map_off {
unsigned int handle;
uint64_t offset;
};
just add an unsigned int pad; between the two members so the 64-bit
fields get natively aligned.
>
>> I still dislike the samsung_drm_ everywhere, just because no other
>> driver does this, but if it helps with backtraces in the future maybe
>> its okay.
>>
>
> Ok, get it. we would consider using 'exynos' instead of 'samsung' seriously
> if you don’t want 'samsung' prefix and then with your comments, the change
> would be done on PATCH v6.
Yeah I think it would be a good idea to just go with exynos, and then
I'll merge V6 into -next.
Dave.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
