Hi, Dave. > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airlied@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2011 3:07 PM > To: Inki Dae > Cc: airlied@xxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > kyungmin.park@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [RESEND] An inquiry about DRM Driver for Samsung SoC Exynos4. > > > > > You can refer to these patches I sent from links below. > > v1: < https://lwn.net/Articles/454380/ > > > v2: < http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1224275.html > > > v3: < http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg13755.html > > > v4: < http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/60439 > > > v5: < http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.video.dri.devel/60802 > > > > > and also you can refer to our working repository below. > > < http://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-2.6-samsung > Branch name : > > dev/samsung-drm > > > > If there are any problems regarding our driver then please give me your > > comments or advices so that we could prepare next patch; otherwise we > wish > > our driver be applied to mainline. > > > > I'll probably give it one more review early next week, but I might > merge it to -next, if I don't find anything seriously wrong. > We would look forward to your comments. thank you. > I still dislike the samsung_drm_ everywhere, just because no other > driver does this, but if it helps with backtraces in the future maybe > its okay. > Ok, get it. we would consider using 'exynos' instead of 'samsung' seriously if you don?t want 'samsung' prefix and then with your comments, the change would be done on PATCH v6. > Dave. Thanks, Inki Dae. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
