Re: [PATCH 1/3] drm/mxsfb: Use gem_free_object_unlocked

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> CMA helpers are struct_mutex free, and so is the mxsfb itself. And
> that's the only valid reason for using gem_free_object. Please read
> the kerneldoc for this stuff :-)

I'm sure all of these came from copy and paste, not the docs.  That
said, the CMA docs currently say:

     * Drivers using the CMA helpers should set this as their
     * &drm_driver.gem_free_object callback.

If you drop the complaint about us reading the docs, the series is:

Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux