On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 11:19:03AM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
> Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > On Fri, 19 May 2017, Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> structure pl111_display_funcs can be made static as it does not need to be
> >> in global scope. Fixes sparse warning:
> >>
> >> "warning: symbol 'pl111_display_funcs' was not declared. Should it
> >> be static?"
> >>
> >> Fixes: bed41005e6174d ("drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111")
> >
> > The patch looks good and I appreciate what you're doing, but I question
> > the usefulness of adding Fixes: tags for trivial stuff like this. I'd
> > prefer Fixes: was reserved for actual fixes that should be backported to
> > any kernels that have the commit being fixed.
>
> Agreed -- since Fixes implies going to stable, we don't want it on
> non-stable-candidates like this. Reviewed these two and will push
> without the tag in a moment.
Fixes does NOT imply that it goes to stable. Only a
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> implies that.
Fixes is purely informational to show where the bug was introduced.
Just today I was using it to see if API changes introduce a bugs that
take months to fix.
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
