On Fri, 19 May 2017, Colin King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> structure pl111_display_funcs can be made static as it does not need to be
> in global scope. Fixes sparse warning:
>
> "warning: symbol 'pl111_display_funcs' was not declared. Should it
> be static?"
>
> Fixes: bed41005e6174d ("drm/pl111: Initial drm/kms driver for pl111")
The patch looks good and I appreciate what you're doing, but I question
the usefulness of adding Fixes: tags for trivial stuff like this. I'd
prefer Fixes: was reserved for actual fixes that should be backported to
any kernels that have the commit being fixed.
The same applies to many other patches you've sent recently.
BR,
Jani.
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c
> index 39a5c33bce7d..bd8ff82c2fd9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/pl111/pl111_display.c
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ static int pl111_display_prepare_fb(struct drm_simple_display_pipe *pipe,
> return drm_fb_cma_prepare_fb(&pipe->plane, plane_state);
> }
>
> -const struct drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs pl111_display_funcs = {
> +static const struct drm_simple_display_pipe_funcs pl111_display_funcs = {
> .check = pl111_display_check,
> .enable = pl111_display_enable,
> .disable = pl111_display_disable,
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
