On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 02:14:35PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 18/05/17 13:59, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Hi Tomi, > > > > Thank you for the patch. > > > > On Thursday 18 May 2017 13:28:26 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >> omap_gem uses page alignment for buffer stride. The related calculations > >> are a bit off, though, as byte stride of 4096 gets aligned to 8192, > >> instead of 4096. This patch fixes those calculations. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c | 4 ++-- > >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c > >> b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c index 13abf221d153..4c41000ff4c4 > >> 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c > >> @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static void evict_entry(struct drm_gem_object *obj, > >> size_t size = PAGE_SIZE * n; > >> loff_t off = mmap_offset(obj) + > >> (entry->obj_pgoff << PAGE_SHIFT); > >> - const int m = 1 + ((omap_obj->width << fmt) / PAGE_SIZE); > >> + const int m = 1 + (((omap_obj->width - 1) << fmt) / PAGE_SIZE); > > > > How about > > > > int m = round_up(omap_obj->width << fmt, PAGE_SIZE); > > > > instead of open-coding it ? I find that a bit easier to understand. > > That should be: > > round_up(omap_obj->width << fmt, PAGE_SIZE) / PAGE_SIZE; Or a bit more optimally just DIV_ROUND_UP() -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
