Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] Intel FPGA VIP Frame Buffer II DRM Driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Ong, Hean Loong" <hean.loong.ong@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, 2017-05-04 at 10:11 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> "Ong, Hean Loong" <hean.loong.ong@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > 
>> > On Wed, 2017-05-03 at 13:28 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
>> > > 
>> > > hean.loong.ong@xxxxxxxxx writes:
>> > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > 
>> > > > From: Ong Hean Loong <hean.loong.ong@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > > > 
>> > > > Hi,
>> > > > 
>> > > > The new Intel Arria10 SOC FPGA devkit has a Display Port IP
>> > > > component 
>> > > > which requires a new driver. This is a virtual driver in which
>> > > > the
>> > > > FGPA hardware would enable the Display Port based on the
>> > > > information
>> > > > and data provided from the DRM frame buffer from the OS.
>> > > > Basically
>> > > > all
>> > > > all information with reagrds to resolution and bits per pixel
>> > > > are
>> > > > pre-configured on the FPGA design and these information are fed
>> > > > to
>> > > > the driver via the device tree information as part of the
>> > > > hardware 
>> > > > information.
>> > > I started reviewing the code, but I want to make sure I
>> > > understand
>> > > what's going on:
>> > > 
>> > > This IP core isn't displaying contents from system memory on some
>> > > sort
>> > > of actual physical display, right?  It's a core that takes some
>> > > input
>> > > video stream (not described in the DT or in this driver) and
>> > > stores
>> > > it
>> > > to memory?
>> > If the IP Core you are referring to is some form of GPU then in
>> > this
>> > case we are using the Intel FPGA Display Port Framebuffer IP. It
>> > does
>> > display contents streamed from the ARM/Linux system to the Display
>> > Port
>> > of the physical Monitor.
>> > 
>> > Below a simple illustration of the system:
>> > 
>> > ARM/Linux --DMA-->Intel FPGA Display Port Framebuffer IP
>> > 				|
>> > 				|
>> > 			Physical Connection
>> > 			Display Port
>> The "DMA" in this diagram is the frame reader IP, right?  The frame
>> reader, as described in the spec, sounds approximately like a DRM
>> plane,
>> so if you have that in your system then that needs to be part of this
>> DRM driver (otherwise you won't be putting the right things on the
>> screen!).
>
> Would the drm_simple_display_pipe_init be able to handle this ? It
> seems to be displaying the proper images on screen, based on my current
> changes. There were recommendations to use the
> drm_simple_display_pipe_init instead of creating the CRTC and planes
> myself

The docs I've read for the Frame Buffer IP don't fit into any current
DRM component, since it's what we're currently calling a "writeback
connector".

I don't understand your system enough to answer.  You didn't answer if
the "DMA" block you diagrammed was the frame reader IP (or maybe the
frame reader IP comes after).  I also don't see how the frame buffer IP
could possibly be connected directly to a physical display connector.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux