On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:01:28 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 12:53:31 -0700
> Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 11:49:54 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > Yep, it's safe and possible to do on pre-PCH as well. For panel
> > > fitting we do need to do an actual power cycle when going from
> > > non-native back to native iirc, but we can still leave them unlocked so
> > > we don't have to worry about the lock/unlock sequence everywhere.
> >
> > Hidden in the unlock patch was a call to intel_lvds_disable from
> > intel_lvds_prepare -- that *always* turns off the LVDS for mode
> > setting. Do we care enough about LVDS mode setting performance that we
> > should try leave the optimization in place that doesn't turn off the
> > backlight when switching between modes?
>
> We hate flicker right? But generally yes it's safer to just turn it
> off all the time.
I'll leave the optimization in place then; it's been there for a while
so at least it shouldn't cause any regressions.
How about this? Has the advantage of not lying in the commit message
anymore.
From 092719152aa5a235d6678798a34dc784d5cec2ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 10:33:12 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915: Leave LVDS registers unlocked
There's no reason to relock them; it just makes operations more
complex. This fixes DPMS where the panel registers were locked making
the disable not work.
Signed-off-by: Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c | 51 +++++++++++-------------------------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
index 6318828..8b521a2 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lvds.c
@@ -400,53 +400,21 @@ out:
static void intel_lvds_prepare(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
{
- struct drm_device *dev = encoder->dev;
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct intel_lvds *intel_lvds = to_intel_lvds(encoder);
- /* We try to do the minimum that is necessary in order to unlock
- * the registers for mode setting.
- *
- * On Ironlake, this is quite simple as we just set the unlock key
- * and ignore all subtleties. (This may cause some issues...)
- *
+ /*
* Prior to Ironlake, we must disable the pipe if we want to adjust
* the panel fitter. However at all other times we can just reset
* the registers regardless.
*/
-
- if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
- I915_WRITE(PCH_PP_CONTROL,
- I915_READ(PCH_PP_CONTROL) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS);
- } else if (intel_lvds->pfit_dirty) {
- I915_WRITE(PP_CONTROL,
- (I915_READ(PP_CONTROL) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS)
- & ~POWER_TARGET_ON);
- } else {
- I915_WRITE(PP_CONTROL,
- I915_READ(PP_CONTROL) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS);
- }
+ if (!HAS_PCH_SPLIT(encoder->dev) && intel_lvds->pfit_dirty)
+ intel_lvds_disable(intel_lvds);
}
static void intel_lvds_commit(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
{
- struct drm_device *dev = encoder->dev;
- struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
struct intel_lvds *intel_lvds = to_intel_lvds(encoder);
- /* Undo any unlocking done in prepare to prevent accidental
- * adjustment of the registers.
- */
- if (HAS_PCH_SPLIT(dev)) {
- u32 val = I915_READ(PCH_PP_CONTROL);
- if ((val & PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS) == PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS)
- I915_WRITE(PCH_PP_CONTROL, val & 0x3);
- } else {
- u32 val = I915_READ(PP_CONTROL);
- if ((val & PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS) == PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS)
- I915_WRITE(PP_CONTROL, val & 0x3);
- }
-
/* Always do a full power on as we do not know what state
* we were left in.
*/
@@ -1042,6 +1010,19 @@ out:
pwm = I915_READ(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1);
pwm |= PWM_PCH_ENABLE;
I915_WRITE(BLC_PWM_PCH_CTL1, pwm);
+ /*
+ * Unlock registers and just
+ * leave them unlocked
+ */
+ I915_WRITE(PCH_PP_CONTROL,
+ I915_READ(PCH_PP_CONTROL) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS);
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Unlock registers and just
+ * leave them unlocked
+ */
+ I915_WRITE(PP_CONTROL,
+ I915_READ(PP_CONTROL) | PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS);
}
dev_priv->lid_notifier.notifier_call = intel_lid_notify;
if (acpi_lid_notifier_register(&dev_priv->lid_notifier)) {
--
1.7.5.4
--
keith.packard@xxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
pgpcfIYTyN9aj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
