On Mon, 08 Aug 2011 11:42:56 -0700 Keith Packard <keithp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 09:30:10 -0700, Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Yep, looks fine. The only think we might want to sprinkle about are > > checks for panel off so we can avoid visible corruption if we whack > > timing or fb stuff while the panel is on. > > So, I'd like to know if we could unlock the panel registers on pre-PCH > hardware as well at init time; that way I could remove the unlock code > From intel_lvds_prepare too. Should it be possible to set the > PANEL_UNLOCK_REGS bits for pre-PCH hardware without having the target off? Yep, it's safe and possible to do on pre-PCH as well. For panel fitting we do need to do an actual power cycle when going from non-native back to native iirc, but we can still leave them unlocked so we don't have to worry about the lock/unlock sequence everywhere. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
