> ahh, ok.. I should check this out (although I'm not entirely sure > where your gma500 staging tree is) Its in GregKH's staging tree or linux-next. It's basically what you've done so if your patch is submitted it'll take me 2 minutes to fix the gma500 tree. > I'm already using your patch to add drm_gem_private_object_init() for > scanout buffers (which need to be physically contiguous). But perhaps > you have some other useful "gems" No I think that one and the offset patch is it. I do need to attack the fb console code next because I need a GEM object as console in some cases and don't have enough virtual address space to vremap it to look linear. Alan _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
