On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Damien Lespiau > <damien.lespiau@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 04:33:43PM +0000, Damien Lespiau wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:27:16AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >>> > Damien - did you ever test these mandatory modes on an actual >>> > commercial 3D TV or similar device? >>> >>> My main testing device was a Samsung TV with this 3D_present bit set and >>> all the advertised modes were working. Can't quite remember if that >>> included the interleaved mode. >> >> I even pushed the EDID of that TV to edid-decode [1] if someone needs to >> check that the EDID parsing is correct. It'd be interesting to see what >> the tool has to say about the edid of the sink causing problems, in >> particular compare the mandatory modes to the other modes advertised by >> that TV. Maybe we could see some kind of pattern emerge, like the 3D >> modes supported being the ones with the timings in table 8-15. > > This is Alastair's display (one of them): http://paste.lisp.org/display/335893 > > I believe this is the interesting part: > > Video data block > VIC 16 1920x1080@60Hz > VIC 31 1920x1080@50Hz > VIC 5 1920x1080i@60Hz > VIC 20 1920x1080i@50Hz > VIC 4 1280x720@60Hz > VIC 19 1280x720@50Hz > VIC 3 720x480@60Hz > VIC 2 720x480@60Hz > VIC 18 720x576@50Hz > VIC 17 720x576@50Hz > VIC 7 1440x480i@60Hz > VIC 6 1440x480i@60Hz > VIC 22 1440x576i@50Hz > VIC 21 1440x576i@50Hz > VIC 32 1920x1080@24Hz > VIC 1 640x480@60Hz > ... > Extended HDMI video details: > 3D present > Base EDID image size is in units of 1cm > VIC index 2 supports side-by-side (half, horizontal) > VIC index 3 supports side-by-side (half, horizontal) > VIC index 4 supports side-by-side (half, horizontal) > VIC index 5 supports side-by-side (half, horizontal) > VIC index 14 supports side-by-side (half, horizontal) > VIC index 0 supports top-and-bottom > VIC index 1 supports top-and-bottom And for the record, this is his other TV (available at the same paste url as above): Video data block VIC 16 1920x1080@60Hz (native) VIC 34 1920x1080@30Hz VIC 32 1920x1080@24Hz VIC 5 1920x1080i@60Hz VIC 4 1280x720@60Hz VIC 3 720x480@60Hz VIC 2 720x480@60Hz VIC 1 640x480@60Hz Extended HDMI video details: 3D present 3D-capable-VIC mask present 3D: Side-by-side (half, horizontal) 3D: Top-and-bottom 3D VIC indices: 2 4 VIC index 0 supports side-by-side (half, horizontal) VIC index 1 supports side-by-side (half, horizontal) VIC index 2 supports side-by-side (half, horizontal) VIC index 3 supports side-by-side (half, horizontal) VIC index 4 supports side-by-side (half, horizontal) After some more conversations with Alastair, it sounds like what's actually going on is that it's just the frame-packing modes that aren't working, but all the side-by-side and top-and-bottom modes from the "mandatory" list work. At this point, I'm more inclined to believe that there's an issue in the nouveau implementation for frame-packed modes. But it could still be the TVs themselves that don't support that at all. Cheers, -ilia _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
