Comment # 31
on bug 98005
from Andy Furniss
(In reply to Andy Furniss from comment #30) > Unerlated observation while testing related to perf = I guess it depends on > stream, but on a raw 2160p60 input from ram, with or without patches, I am > more than twice as fast with init-qp <= 28. > > Timing luck loosing me dual instance? Or something more fundamental meaning > the encoder works harder al lower rates? > > I notice that unlike omx when using cqp, some rate control settings are > still filled in. Hacking them the same made no difference. This turned out to be a gstreamer wierd because I didn't have a ! queue ! before the encoder. > omx is the same speed with higher qp - and produces bigger files for the > same qp. Still makes slightly bigger files (cabac is on for both)
You are receiving this mail because:
- You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
