Hi, Arnd: I've made a mistake that I've tried to build these patches on v4.9-rc1, but I does not set CONFIG_DRM_MEDIATEK=y, therefore I didn't find out these build fails. Now I fix the config problem, and I think I should build these patches on latest kernel version even though patch's owner test on old kernel version. I wish this flow would make things better. It's ok that you just revert these two patches. I've fixed build fail and will request pull later. Regards, CK On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 16:24 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday, November 17, 2016 8:50:05 PM CET Dave Airlie wrote: > > > > Arnd could you send a git pull with the two reverts, with my Acked-by on > > it? I won't be in a place to do it for 8-9hrs. > > I don't think it's that urgent, as long as we make sure it's fixed in the > next -rc. I've sent out the reverts as patches with a little more information > in the changelog: it turns out that they are actually broken on linux-next too, > they had just not made it in there, and one of the two actually did build > on older kernels. > > I think what happened here is that the fixes were tested on a v4.4 kernel > and blindly forward-ported. It probably makes sense to look at the > entire series again in case another one of them is broken. > > Philipp, Hu, Bibby, could one of you have another look? > > Arnd _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
