On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 11:00:04AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 15, 2016 at 02:30:47PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote: > > On 11/15/2016 2:21 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 10:26:08PM +0530, Sharma, Shashank wrote: > > > > In any case, I guess addition of a cap for aspect ratio should fix the > > > > current objections for this implementation. > > > > > > > > And I will keep it 0 by default, so that no aspect ratio information is > > > > added until userspace sets the cap to 1 on its own. > > > Note that cap = needs new userspace. > > > -Daniel > > I guess you mean a new libdrm, so yes, I will add this new cap in libdrm. > > Is that what you mean ? > > Full stack solution, including enabling in an Xorg driver (or somewhere > else, we also have drm_hwcomposer as an option). > > And because that's probably going to take forever I'm leaning towards > revert again. Ville? Yeah I guess we'll need to push the revert to avoid the regression. Trying to put in new client caps and whatnot after -rc5 doesn't seem like a viable option to me. -- Ville Syrjälä Intel OTC _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
