On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:58:46PM +0000, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 11 November 2016 at 10:56, Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi Shailendra,
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:16:08PM +0530, Shailendra Verma wrote:
> >> From: "Shailendra Verma" <shailendra.v@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> There is possible dereference of NULL pointer if kmalloc fails.
> >
> > You could add: ... when the function returns. From the patch itself it is
> > not clear where the problem is.
> >
> As the function returns we have "return &state->base;" Since base is
> at offset 0 there will be no deref and the compiler will return NULL.
> Not sure if that's 100% legal, though.
>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_planes.c | 3 +++
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_planes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_planes.c
> >> index 82c193e..f769398 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_planes.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/malidp_planes.c
> >> @@ -54,6 +54,9 @@ struct drm_plane_state *malidp_duplicate_plane_state(struct drm_plane *plane)
> >> return NULL;
> >>
> >> state = kmalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> + if (!state)
> >> + return NULL;
> >> +
> >> if (state) {
> Might want to drop this line - as-is things read quite weird ?
I've already done that in the patched that I've queued in my tree, I just need to push
it to the public tree.
... now if that server would be online when I need it .... :(
Best regards,
Liviu
>
> Either way, not my driver - so don't read too much into the above ;-)
> Emil
--
====================
| I would like to |
| fix the world, |
| but they're not |
| giving me the |
\ source code! /
---------------
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
