Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "drm: Add and handle new aspect ratios in DRM layer"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



If I was not very clear for the first time, every time we send a patch to drm-intel/dri-devel, we do basic testing on Gnome-desktop too (Not only Android).

So even these aspect ratio patches were tested with full gnome-desktop, and it worked well.


Regards
Shashank
On 11/3/2016 9:49 PM, Sharma, Shashank wrote:


On 11/3/2016 9:33 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you still think you should send this revert, I am removing my NACK.
Pls Go ahead.
The other option is to not revert and instead slap a fix on top. But
that would have to be done reasonably quickly so that the thing is
ready in time for 4.10. We're closing in on 4.9-rc4 now so I guess
we should still have a few weeks to fix things up. Whether that's
enough I don't know. If not, then we should revert.
1 week and then revert is the guideline. Please don't bend the rules
for regressions all the time, it makes things painful for everyone
else.
-Daniel
I don't remember breaking it for first time itself.
As I mentioned in the other thread, please add the regression details.
After that, revert it if you want (I saw you have already given maintainers-ack)

Regards
Shashank


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux