On 11/3/2016 9:33 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 2:49 PM, Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you still think you should send this revert, I am removing my NACK.
Pls Go ahead.
The other option is to not revert and instead slap a fix on top. But
that would have to be done reasonably quickly so that the thing is
ready in time for 4.10. We're closing in on 4.9-rc4 now so I guess
we should still have a few weeks to fix things up. Whether that's
enough I don't know. If not, then we should revert.
1 week and then revert is the guideline. Please don't bend the rules
for regressions all the time, it makes things painful for everyone
else.
-Daniel
I don't remember breaking it for first time itself.
As I mentioned in the other thread, please add the regression details.
After that, revert it if you want (I saw you have already given
maintainers-ack)
Regards
Shashank
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
