On 09/27/2016 06:58 PM, Sean Paul wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 10:06 AM, Tomeu Vizoso
<tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There's no point in enabling PSR when the panel doesn't support it.
This also avoids a problem when PSR gets enabled when a CRTC is being
disabled, because sometimes in that situation the DSP_HOLD_VALID_INTR
interrupt on which we wait will never arrive. This was observed on
RK3288 with a panel without PSR (veyron-jaq Chromebook).
It's very easy to reproduce by running the kms_rmfb test in IGT a few
times.
Signed-off-by: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for digging into this.
Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
queued to drm-misc.
Archit
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Yakir Yang <ykk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c
index e83be157cc2a..8548e8271639 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rockchip/analogix_dp-rockchip.c
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ static void analogix_dp_psr_set(struct drm_encoder *encoder, bool enabled)
struct rockchip_dp_device *dp = to_dp(encoder);
unsigned long flags;
+ if (!analogix_dp_psr_supported(dp->dev))
+ return;
+
dev_dbg(dp->dev, "%s PSR...\n", enabled ? "Entry" : "Exit");
spin_lock_irqsave(&dp->psr_lock, flags);
--
2.7.4
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
