On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:28:18PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 20:20:48 +0200 > > The ttm_tt_destroy() function tests whether its argument is NULL > and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > index 39386f5..23809d0 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c > @@ -146,9 +146,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_release_list(struct kref *list_kref) > BUG_ON(bo->mem.mm_node != NULL); > BUG_ON(!list_empty(&bo->lru)); > BUG_ON(!list_empty(&bo->ddestroy)); > - > - if (bo->ttm) > - ttm_tt_destroy(bo->ttm); > + tm_tt_destroy(bo->ttm); This doesn't compile. Tsk, pls be more careful, and definitely compile-test _all_ your changes before hitting send. I've dropped this one from my queue, the others still look ok. -Daniel > atomic_dec(&bo->glob->bo_count); > if (bo->resv == &bo->ttm_resv) > reservation_object_fini(&bo->ttm_resv); > -- > 2.9.1 > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
