Re: [PATCH 00/21] drm: make fbdev support really optional

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 15 July 2016 at 14:37, Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hello Emil,
>>
>> Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> On 15 July 2016 at 13:47, Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> as request by Daniel here (http://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg112592.html) I went ahead and also cleaned up the other Kconfig files. I have mostly compile tested the changes on an ARMv7 system (COMPILE_TEST).
>>>>
>>> Yay :-) IIRC some drivers don't fully use the fb_helpers (for example
>>> vmwgfx still references the cfb_* API), so they should be updated as
>>> well.
>> I can only do this on ARM atm, so I suggest to just drop insufficient
>> patches.
>>
> Without checking (build and/or grep) it'll be a bit hard to figure out
> which patches are insufficient. At the end of the day it's up-to you
> and DRM maintainer(s).
I kind of was expecting this, so I asked Daniel on IRC if I was supposed
to only inspect the Kconfigs. Seems like this doesn't suffice in every
case. :(

- Tobias

> 
> Thanks for sorting out these. The negative diffstat is always appreciated ;-)
> -Emil
> 

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux