Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2016, 14:43 +0200 schrieb Daniel Vetter: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:54:28PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 25 May 2016 15:18:16 +0200 Lothar Waßmann wrote: > > > The 'de-active' and 'pixelclk-active' DT properties are evaluated > > > by of_parse_display_timing() called from of_get_drm_display_mode(), > > > but later lost in the conversion from videomode.flags to > > > drm_display_mode.flags. > > > Use an open coded version of of_get_drm_display_mode() to get access > > > to these flags and make sure they are passed on to the ipu-di driver. > > > > > > Changes vs. v2: > > > - removed patches which have already been applied > > > - created a drm_bus_flags_from_videomode() helper to prevent code > > > duplication as suggested by Philipp Zabel > > > > > > Changes vs. v1: > > > - rebased on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9113791/ as > > > per Philipp Zabel's request > > > > > > GIT: [PATCHv2 1/3] drm/imx: imx-ldb: honor 'native-mode' property when > > > GIT: [PATCHv2 2/3] drm/imx: convey the pixelclk-active and de-active flags > > > GIT: [PATCHv2 3/3] drm/imx: remove dead code > > Should this be split up into 3 patches? At least it's good practice to > split up the drm core helper functions into it's own patch, instead of > hiding it behind something with the drm/imx prefix - no one will spot it > that way. > > > Ping?! > > If imx maintainers keep being asleep at the helm I can merge this through > drm-misc, but I'd like some more tested-by from other folks if possible. > Even better when there's a review. This clashes with the atomic modeset changes. If you don't disagree with the core change, I can include it with the next imx-drm/next pull request. regards Philipp _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
