On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 01:54:28PM +0200, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 25 May 2016 15:18:16 +0200 Lothar Waßmann wrote: > > The 'de-active' and 'pixelclk-active' DT properties are evaluated > > by of_parse_display_timing() called from of_get_drm_display_mode(), > > but later lost in the conversion from videomode.flags to > > drm_display_mode.flags. > > Use an open coded version of of_get_drm_display_mode() to get access > > to these flags and make sure they are passed on to the ipu-di driver. > > > > Changes vs. v2: > > - removed patches which have already been applied > > - created a drm_bus_flags_from_videomode() helper to prevent code > > duplication as suggested by Philipp Zabel > > > > Changes vs. v1: > > - rebased on top of https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9113791/ as > > per Philipp Zabel's request > > > > GIT: [PATCHv2 1/3] drm/imx: imx-ldb: honor 'native-mode' property when > > GIT: [PATCHv2 2/3] drm/imx: convey the pixelclk-active and de-active flags > > GIT: [PATCHv2 3/3] drm/imx: remove dead code Should this be split up into 3 patches? At least it's good practice to split up the drm core helper functions into it's own patch, instead of hiding it behind something with the drm/imx prefix - no one will spot it that way. > Ping?! If imx maintainers keep being asleep at the helm I can merge this through drm-misc, but I'd like some more tested-by from other folks if possible. Even better when there's a review. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
