On Fr, 2016-06-10 at 17:20 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 12:07:53AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Now that the core helpers support nonblocking atomic commits there's > > no need to invent that wheel separately (instead of fixing the bug in > > the atomic implementation of virtio, as it should have been done!). > > > > v2: Rebased on top of > > > > commit e7cf0963f816fa44190caaf51aeffaa614c340c6 > > Author: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Tue May 31 08:50:47 2016 +0200 > > > > virtio-gpu: add atomic_commit function > > > > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> (v1) > > Reviewed-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> (v1) > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > Gerd, can you pls retest? I think due to your change in the above > referenced commit to switch to active_only=true in commit_planes() this is > now broken. Yes, probably it'll break things. Any branch I can test? Your "stuff" branch seems to not yet have the commit above. I guess virtio-gpu should switch over to override .atomic_commit_tail instead of .atomic_commit? cheers, Gerd _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
