Re: [PATCH] drm.h: Handle DragonFly like Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 17 May 2016 at 01:26, Francois Tigeot <ftigeot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> FreeBSD and NetBSD even have two different drm.h kernel headers. For some
> reason they think it is a good idea to keep a separate drm implementation
> from ~= 10 years ago or so.

No, we (FreeBSD) don't think it's a good idea. It's an unfortunate
situation that we've ended up in, and is going to take some effort to
clean up, but is not a desired long-term state.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux