Re: [PATCH] drm.h: Handle DragonFly like Linux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi François,

On 14 May 2016 at 08:13, François Tigeot <ftigeot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The drm code in DragonFly uses a local Linux implementation which doesn't
> define the __linux__ macro.
>
> Use __DragonFly__ instead in order to not try to compile non-Linux code.
Does that meant that the workarounds in the else statements don't work
? I doubt that anyone will mind if we update/correct them.
Alternatively if one insists on using the __linux__ route here, imho
it's better to just set the define it in your build.

All that aside, for next revision/future work please check the
documentation [1] and add your s-o-b line. Also, please base your work
against Dave's drm-next branch [2]

Thank you
Emil

[1] https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
See section 11
[2] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~airlied/linux
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux