On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 5:45 PM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 27 April 2016 at 10:47, Russell King - ARM Linux > <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a manner as seen >>> with this series might not be too wise. David H, can we hear your view >>> on the topic ? >> >> For armada and etnaviv, it seems sensible, so I'd be happy to see the >> change go in if it means less work for others. >> >> Hence, for patch 2 and 4, >> >> Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > Thank you Russel ! > > > Dave, David H, > > So far we've got 6 (if we count the one Rob gave over IRC) acks on the topic. > > How do we proceed with this - would you like me to elaborate more on > the topic, do you see some serious downfalls with the proposal ? [And > yes I agree that tweaking the generator scripts to produce these might > be better but that's a bit out of my reach atm] > > If you are OK should we merge the series via drm-next or danvet's > drm-misc ? ... once I we hear from a few more people of course - > mainly AMD and Ben. No objections here. Alex > > Regards, > Emil > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
