On 27 April 2016 at 10:47, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 09:17:13PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >> Dave Airlie pointed out that "polluting" the headers in a manner as seen >> with this series might not be too wise. David H, can we hear your view >> on the topic ? > > For armada and etnaviv, it seems sensible, so I'd be happy to see the > change go in if it means less work for others. > > Hence, for patch 2 and 4, > > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Thank you Russel ! Dave, David H, So far we've got 6 (if we count the one Rob gave over IRC) acks on the topic. How do we proceed with this - would you like me to elaborate more on the topic, do you see some serious downfalls with the proposal ? [And yes I agree that tweaking the generator scripts to produce these might be better but that's a bit out of my reach atm] If you are OK should we merge the series via drm-next or danvet's drm-misc ? ... once I we hear from a few more people of course - mainly AMD and Ben. Regards, Emil _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
