2016-04-15 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>: > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Christian König > <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Might be that how amdgpu uses the fence context and sequence number is a bit > > questionable, but this will completely break it. > > You mean it tries to qualesce fences in the same context down to just > the last one? That's how it's supposed to be done, and > fence_collections do break this somewhat. Without fixing up > fence_is_later and friends. Sounds like amdgpu is a good use case to > make sure the changes in semantics in these functions result in > sensible code. In a way a fence_collection is a fence where the > timeline never matches with any other timeline (since it's a > combiation). > > And yeah I think fence_collection should probably compress down the > fences to 1 per timeline. But then that's just an implementation > detail we can fix later on. You mean asking for a new context for every collection? Gustavo _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
