Hi Emil,
On 13 April 2016 at 20:15, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Xinliang,
>
> On 11 April 2016 at 09:55, Xinliang Liu <xinliang.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> +static int kirin_drm_connectors_register(struct drm_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_connector *connector;
>> + struct drm_connector *failed_connector;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>> + drm_for_each_connector(connector, dev) {
>> + ret = drm_connector_register(connector);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + failed_connector = connector;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err:
>> + drm_for_each_connector(connector, dev) {
>> + if (failed_connector == connector)
>> + break;
>> + drm_connector_unregister(connector);
>> + }
>> + mutex_unlock(&dev->mode_config.mutex);
>> +
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
> Iirc we have new drm_connector_{un,}register_all() helpers.You might
> want to use it once they are in (i.e. not sure what your base is and
> if they have landed yet).
I can't find these drm_connector_{un,}register_all() helpers in latest
tag v4.6-rc3.
>
>
>> +static struct device_node *kirin_get_remote_node(struct device_node *np)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *endpoint, *remote;
>> +
>> + /* get the first endpoint, in our case only one remote node
>> + * is connected to display controller.
>> + */
>> + endpoint = of_graph_get_next_endpoint(np, NULL);
>> + if (!endpoint) {
>> + DRM_ERROR("no valid endpoint node\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> + }
>> + of_node_put(endpoint);
>> +
>> + remote = of_graph_get_remote_port_parent(endpoint);
>> + if (!remote) {
>> + DRM_ERROR("no valid remote node\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> + }
>> + of_node_put(remote);
>> +
>> + if (!of_device_is_available(remote)) {
>> + DRM_ERROR("not available for remote node\n");
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> + }
>> +
> This seems like a common pattern in many platform DRM drivers. Yet
> some tend to differ in subtle ways - I'm leaning that they might be
> bugs, but one cannot be too sure.
>
> A friendly request:
> Can you please follow up by adding a helper and removing the
> duplication thoughout ?
Yes, I will create another patch set for this. I think I need to
figure out other drivers requirements.
Maybe, I need to add one more parameter for this helper. That's
endpoint index to get which endpoint remote node.
I will follow up this.
Thanks,
-xinliang
>
> Thanks
> Emil
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
