* Sedat Dilek (sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > * Sedat Dilek (sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > >> [ As I am not subscribed to both MLs and lazy to pick up all involved people ] > >> > >> Hi Chris, > >> > >> The original patch had also this part (see the revert in [1]): > >> ... > >> +#include <linux/security.h> > >> ... > >> > >> Your new patch in [2] is missing it or is it not required? > > > > It was just a patch on top of the bad commit (47970b1b), the #include is > > required. > > > > thanks, > > -chris > > > > OK, now I see. > Might be good to push a v2 as the initial patch was reverted in the meantime? > The explanations of the fixup patch were helpful (to me) and should be included. Yeah, I'll send a new patch to James. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
