On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > * Sedat Dilek (sedat.dilek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: >> [ As I am not subscribed to both MLs and lazy to pick up all involved people ] >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> The original patch had also this part (see the revert in [1]): >> ... >> +#include <linux/security.h> >> ... >> >> Your new patch in [2] is missing it or is it not required? > > It was just a patch on top of the bad commit (47970b1b), the #include is > required. > > thanks, > -chris > OK, now I see. Might be good to push a v2 as the initial patch was reverted in the meantime? The explanations of the fixup patch were helpful (to me) and should be included. - Sedat - _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
