On Wednesday 26 January 2011, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > I guess you're meaning cx25821, right? Right, sorry for the typo. > Palash should take a look on it and review. This is a device that allows > 12 simultaneous streams, so, I suspect that he'll need to do some > changes at the locking schema, to avoid performance bottlenecks. I would be surprised if there was any measurable performance change. The BKL was used only in the open() function to iterate the device list, and that code is nowhere on a critical path, as far as I can tell. Arnd _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel