Em 26-01-2011 09:31, Arnd Bergmann escreveu: > On Wednesday 26 January 2011, Greg KH wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:17:14PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: >>> I've gone through all the code in the kernel that >>> uses the big kernel lock and come up with a solution >>> that seems at least half-reasonable for each of them. >>> >>> The decisions are somewhat arbitrary, but here is >>> what I'd suggest we do: >>> >>> * Remove in 2.6.39: >>> i830, autofs3, smbfs >> >> I thought some people really wanted to keep i830. Or was that i810? >> I'll drop autofs3 and smbfs, thanks. > > i810 needs to be kept, i830 is obsolete, see the patch changelogs > there. I assume that Dave Airlie will take both patches (i810 BKL > removal and i830 removal) into his 2.6.39 queue. > >>> * Work around in an ugly way, but keep alive: >>> * ufs, ipx, i810, cx25721 >>> >>> * Fix properly: >>> * usbip, go7007, adfs, x25 >> >> Thanks for the usbip and go7007 patches, I'll queue them up. > > It would be good if you could also take the cx25721 patch. It's > not the nicest one I've done, but it's a bug fix nonetheless. I guess you're meaning cx25821, right? Palash should take a look on it and review. This is a device that allows 12 simultaneous streams, so, I suspect that he'll need to do some changes at the locking schema, to avoid performance bottlenecks. Cheers, Mauro _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
