W dniu 4 czerwca 2010 21:55 użytkownik Jerome Glisse
<glisse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> napisał:
> On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:54:42PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> 2010/6/4 Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> > Instead of dumping unprocessed dwords, dump the last 64
>> > dwords of the ring. This make debugging of some case easier.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c | 6 +++---
>> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
>> > index f68cc92..1537079 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
>> > @@ -3371,9 +3371,9 @@ static int r600_debugfs_cp_ring_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
>> > seq_printf(m, "driver's copy of the CP_RB_RPTR 0x%08x\n", rdev->cp.rptr);
>> > seq_printf(m, "%u free dwords in ring\n", rdev->cp.ring_free_dw);
>> > seq_printf(m, "%u dwords in ring\n", count);
>> > - i = rdev->cp.rptr;
>> > - for (j = 0; j <= count; j++) {
>> > - seq_printf(m, "r[%04d]=0x%08x\n", i, rdev->cp.ring[i]);
>> > + i = (rdev->cp.wptr + (rdev->cp.ring_size / 4) - 64) & rdev->cp.ptr_mask;
>> > + for (j = 0; j <= 64; j++) {
>> > + seq_printf(m, "r[%04d]=0x%08X\n", i, rdev->cp.ring[i]);
>> > i = (i + 1) & rdev->cp.ptr_mask;
>> > }
>> > return 0;
>> > --
>> > 1.7.0.1
>>
>> What about same for r1xx-r5xx? Could you care?
>>
>> --
>> Rafał
>
> Yes will do the patch, sorry i was working on r6xx bug at the time i did
> this patch.
Thanks :)
--
Rafał
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
