On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 02:54:42PM +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2010/6/4 Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Instead of dumping unprocessed dwords, dump the last 64
> > dwords of the ring. This make debugging of some case easier.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
> > index f68cc92..1537079 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c
> > @@ -3371,9 +3371,9 @@ static int r600_debugfs_cp_ring_info(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
> > seq_printf(m, "driver's copy of the CP_RB_RPTR 0x%08x\n", rdev->cp.rptr);
> > seq_printf(m, "%u free dwords in ring\n", rdev->cp.ring_free_dw);
> > seq_printf(m, "%u dwords in ring\n", count);
> > - i = rdev->cp.rptr;
> > - for (j = 0; j <= count; j++) {
> > - seq_printf(m, "r[%04d]=0x%08x\n", i, rdev->cp.ring[i]);
> > + i = (rdev->cp.wptr + (rdev->cp.ring_size / 4) - 64) & rdev->cp.ptr_mask;
> > + for (j = 0; j <= 64; j++) {
> > + seq_printf(m, "r[%04d]=0x%08X\n", i, rdev->cp.ring[i]);
> > i = (i + 1) & rdev->cp.ptr_mask;
> > }
> > return 0;
> > --
> > 1.7.0.1
>
> What about same for r1xx-r5xx? Could you care?
>
> --
> Rafał
Yes will do the patch, sorry i was working on r6xx bug at the time i did
this patch.
Cheers,
Jerome
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
