On Tue, 11 May 2010 12:10:01 -0700, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 11 May 2010 19:52:31 +0100 > Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 May 2010 11:35:55 -0400, Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > No, io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() cannot be used from [soft]irq context: > > > it hardwires use of KM_USER0. I suggest that io_mapping_create_wc(), > > > io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() etc be changed so that the caller passes in the > > > KM_foo kmap slot index. > > > > Argh, sorry for the noise, read the mail in the wrong order. Thanks for > > the review. It would be sensible to go with your simpler patch whilst > > io_mapping_map_atomic_wc() is improved. > > OK. I'll be sending a bunch of fixes Linuswards in an hour or two. > Should I include this? Yes. Acked-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
