> The current interrupt handler in xdma.c was using xdma->stop_request > before locking the vchan lock. 1. Will an additional imperative wording become helpful here? https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.10-rc1#n94 2. How do you think about to use the summary phrase “Fix data synchronisation in xdma_channel_isr()”? 3. Will development interests grow for the usage of a statement like “guard(spin)(&xchan->vchan.lock);”? https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc1/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L124 Regards, Markus
