On 16-04-24, 17:05, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > Anyway, the changes are in -next. What do we do now? Do I revert > > > it? Mukesh, can you please agree with Vinod? > > > > I dont apply patches to other subsystem without the ack. Either way you > > can ask always! > > Yes, you are totally right; but please, keep in mind that this > patch has some history and I would have loved to hear from you > earlier. Anyway... There was merge window, I dont look up during that. Then I had some family stuff and travel to take care... Things happen. When in doubt pls ask, a gentle reminder goes long way! > > > I will leave it upto you... > > ... Mukesh, I'm sorry, but I'm going to revert this patch again > until we address all the last minute issues from Vinod. The > silence on this thread is worrying me more than reverting it. > > I hope this will be the last time I revert this patch. > > Moreover, in order to avoid maintainers' rumble (:)), please > let's try to split patches that are touching more than one > subsystems keeping the logical meainings intact. That is best. Very rarely we have a situation where we add changes which break bisect and it has to be clubbed together. But for other cases, it should always be split! > I hope this is fine with you, Vinod. Thank you for understanding -- ~Vinod
