On 02-04-24, 18:44, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 10:15:24PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > On 28-03-24, 08:36, Andi Shyti wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 10:56:39 +0530, Mukesh Kumar Savaliya wrote: > > > > I2C driver currently reports "DMA txn failed" error even though it's > > > > NACK OR BUS_PROTO OR ARB_LOST. Detect NACK error when no device ACKs > > > > on the bus instead of generic transfer failure which doesn't give any > > > > specific clue. > > > > > > > > Make Changes inside i2c driver callback handler function > > > > i2c_gpi_cb_result() to parse these errors and make sure GSI driver > > > > stores the error status during error interrupt. > > > > > > > > [...] > > > > > > Applied to i2c/i2c-host-next on > > > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/local tree > > > > You applied changes to dmaengine driver without my ack! I dont agree to > > the approach here, we could do better > > this must be an error from b4 ty. The changes have been added to > > pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git > > branch i2c/i2c-host, As it has been agreed from very long. > > Anyway, the changes are in -next. What do we do now? Do I revert > it? Mukesh, can you please agree with Vinod? I dont apply patches to other subsystem without the ack. Either way you can ask always! I will leave it upto you... -- ~Vinod
