On 26/03/2024 13:06, Inochi Amaoto wrote: e. >>>> + regmap_set_bits(dmamux->regmap, >>>> + DMAMUX_CH_REG(chid), >>>> + DMAMUX_CH_SET(chid, devid)); >>>> + >>>> + regmap_update_bits(dmamux->regmap, CV1800_SDMA_DMA_INT_MUX, >>>> + DMAMUX_INT_CH_MASK(chid, cpuid), >>>> + DMAMUX_INT_CH_BIT(chid, cpuid)); >>> >>> I think this is. >> >> So where exactly? I don't see any define being used here. >> CV1800_SDMA_DMA_INT_MUX is not in your header. DMAMUX_ is not in your >> header. So what are you pointing? >> >> I don't understand this communication. Are you mocking me here or what? >> It's waste of my time. >> > > I apologize for my misunderstanding and your wasted time. I had > previously thought that hardware constants is also binding. This > leads to a weird communication between us. Since I agree and > understand this file is not a binding, I will remove this file in > the next version. Anyway, thanks for your kindly explanation. OK, no problem. When I asked where do you use header, it should make you think... remove the #include from the driver and everything still compiles, so obviously header is not being used. Best regards, Krzysztof
