> On 14. 2. 2023, at 17:12, Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 15:10:53 +0100, Martin Povišer wrote: >> Describe the SIO coprocessor which serves as pretend DMA controller on >> recent Apple platforms. >> >> Signed-off-by: Martin Povišer <povik+lin@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> >> Since the schema mentions a loader preparing the binding appropriately, >> here's a PR with the relevant (WIP) loader code, if anyone wants to look: >> https://github.com/AsahiLinux/m1n1/pull/286 >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/dma/apple,sio.yaml | 129 ++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 129 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/apple,sio.yaml >> > > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): > > yamllint warnings/errors: > > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/apple,sio.example.dts:24.35-27.11: Warning (node_name_vs_property_name): /example-0/interrupt-controller: node name and property name conflict I saw the warning, but since I had copied that part of the example from apple,admac.yaml I didn’t make much of it. Now that I look at it again, the example in apple,admac doesn’t raise the same warning, how come? This is just a curiosity since we don’t need the aic node in the example anyway (unlike in apple,admac where it’s needed because of empty entries in interrupts-extended). Martin
