On 07-10-20, 12:04, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 03:23:13PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > > Right my build failed for x86 and I have dropped these now. I would have > > expected the dependency to be a signed tag to be cross merged when I was > > asked to merge this. > > I can give you a signed tag is you prefer but that's usually not That would be better, signed tags are preferred > necessary. You can simply merge tip's x86/pasid branch, then apply those > ontop and test. While at it, it would be good if x86 patches of this series come from your tree, that makes more sense if we are doing a cross merge Thanks -- ~Vinod
