Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix Kconfig dependency issue with DMAENGINES selection

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Vinod,

On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:17:44PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 31-07-20, 18:24, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This small series fixes a Kconfig dependency issue with the recently
> > merged Xilixn DPSUB DRM/KMS driver. The fix is in patch 3/3, but
> > requires a separate fixes in patches 1/3 and 2/3 to avoid circular
> > dependencies:
> > 
> >         drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:error: recursive dependency detected!
> >         drivers/i2c/Kconfig:8:  symbol I2C is selected by FB_DDC
> >         drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:63: symbol FB_DDC depends on FB
> >         drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig:12: symbol FB is selected by DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER
> >         drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:80:     symbol DRM_KMS_FB_HELPER depends on DRM_KMS_HELPER
> >         drivers/gpu/drm/Kconfig:74:     symbol DRM_KMS_HELPER is selected by DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB
> >         drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/Kconfig:1: symbol DRM_ZYNQMP_DPSUB depends on DMA_ENGINE
> >         drivers/dma/Kconfig:44: symbol DMA_ENGINE depends on DMADEVICES
> >         drivers/dma/Kconfig:6:  symbol DMADEVICES is selected by SND_SOC_SH4_SIU
> >         sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:30:        symbol SND_SOC_SH4_SIU is selected by SND_SIU_MIGOR
> >         sound/soc/sh/Kconfig:60:        symbol SND_SIU_MIGOR depends on I2C
> >         For a resolution refer to Documentation/kbuild/kconfig-language.rst
> >         subsection "Kconfig recursive dependency limitations"
> > 
> > Due to the DPSUB driver being merged in v5.9, this is a candidate fix
> > for v5.9 as well. 1/3 and 2/3 can be merged independently, 3/3 depends
> > on the first two. What's the best course of action, can I merge this all
> > in a single tree, or should the rapidio and ASoC patches be merged
> > independently early in the -rc cycle, and the DRM patch later on top ? I
> > don't expect conflicts (especially in 2/3 and 3/3), so merging the whole
> > series in one go would be simpler in my opinion.
> 
> Acked-By: Vinod Koul <vkoul@xxxxxxxxxx>

Thank you.

As Mark as queued the sound fix in his for-next branch for v5.9, could
you queue the dmaengine fix for v5.9 too ?

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux ARM (vger)]     [Linux ARM MSM]     [Linux Omap]     [Linux Arm]     [Linux Tegra]     [Fedora ARM]     [Linux for Samsung SOC]     [eCos]     [Linux PCI]     [Linux Fastboot]     [Gcc Help]     [Git]     [DCCP]     [IETF Announce]     [Security]     [Linux MIPS]     [Yosemite Campsites]

  Powered by Linux