On 16-07-20, 16:46, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > Yes that is only thing atm. Also I think we should rethink how we are > > tying the channels and can we do a better way to handle that > > Thanks. I'll make the necessary changes and submit a new version. If you > think a new API is needed to tie channels together, can it be developed > on top ? Sure, that is entirely reasonable -- ~Vinod
