On Sun, Apr 15, 2018 at 02:12:30PM -0400, Frank Mori Hess wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> Hi, what is the state of this patch? I just noticed in patchwork it > >> is now listed as "Not applicable"? The original broken-by-wordwrap > >> patch is listed as "Accepted"? > >> > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-dmaengine/list/?submitter=178687&state=* > > > > That is not correct state, my script would update as not applicable when it > > doesn't find patch in my queue.. > > > >> I found it has a bug handling dregs btw, I'll include a fix for that > >> in the next version or as a follow-on patch as appropriate. > > > > Looks like I have missed this one somehow, so please update the patch with > > fix and I shall look into it. > > > > Ok, I tested the v4 patch and it turns out it was a false alarm about > the bug in handling dregs. It works fine. I've registered in the > dmaengine patchwork, and changed the state of the v4 patch back to > "new". Can you please repost this one after rebasing to dmaengine -next -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
