On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, what is the state of this patch? I just noticed in patchwork it >> is now listed as "Not applicable"? The original broken-by-wordwrap >> patch is listed as "Accepted"? >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-dmaengine/list/?submitter=178687&state=* > > That is not correct state, my script would update as not applicable when it > doesn't find patch in my queue.. > >> I found it has a bug handling dregs btw, I'll include a fix for that >> in the next version or as a follow-on patch as appropriate. > > Looks like I have missed this one somehow, so please update the patch with > fix and I shall look into it. > Ok, I tested the v4 patch and it turns out it was a false alarm about the bug in handling dregs. It works fine. I've registered in the dmaengine patchwork, and changed the state of the v4 patch back to "new". -- Frank -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
