Hi Viresh,
On Tue, 2017-10-31 at 10:38 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 30-10-17, 13:09, Shevchenko, Andriy wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > During ELCE 2017 Lars, Alexey and me had a chat with regards to DMA
> > subsystem. There were IIRC few topics. Let me summarize what was being
> > discussed and the next steps.
> >
> > (Lars, Alexey, please correct me if / where I'm wrong)
> >
> > DesignWare DMA driver (AHB)
> > ---------------------------
> > I have a lot of stuff to do besides this one driver. Moreover, it looks
> > like there is nothing (features) anticipated to be done to the driver
> > from me since Intel switched to its own DMA engine, IDMA, which looks
> > like DW DMA, though 64-bit (though 32-bit version of it, that present in
> > few Intel SoCs, had been embedded to DesignWare DMA driver already).
> >
> > Thus, I would like to step down from co-maintainer to just a designated
> > reviewer for the driver. Synopsys may take over, and Alexey has a
> > candidate in his mind.
> >
> > I also think Viresh can do the same. Viresh?
> >
> > That said, we will keep an eye on driver changes.
> >
> > The proposed change is a patch from Synopsys against MAINTAINERS data
> > base from the potential (co-)maintainer of the driver where Viresh and
> > me are moved under R: and new maintainer under M: records respectively.
>
> I am fine with adding a new co-maintainer from Synopsys here if they
> can provide a dedicated source.
Not really clear what did you mean here. Could you please elaborate a bit
on that?
-Alexey��.n��������+%������w��{.n��������)�)�� jg��� �����ݢj����G���� ���j:+v���w�m������w�������h�����٥
